• slider4

    ABODE™ business transformation methodology  founded on EA3.0

  • slide1

    Enterprise Architecture 3.0 (EA3.0) - the third wave in Enterprise Architecture approaches

  • slider3

    A3 KAM - Triple A(Architectural, Actionable and  Augmented) Knowledge Assets Management

  • slider2

    Generalized Enterprise Function Framework  (GEFF)

Requirement Management

During Requirement Management the generic requirements as stated in the BC, PSA, PROSA, PID, etc. is enriched with the solution requirements as defined by Product Owners, (Super) Users, Security and Privacy Officers, System Management, and technical specialist. When necessary or available EPICS and User Stories can be either defined and/or used.

 

Problems and Solutions

The contemporary approach is challenged with incomplete architecture models, principles, design and development documentation. This leads to tiresome gathering of functional and non-functional requirements for new innovation solutions. Almost every time a project starts, a new collection of requirements must be defined for the transition processes.

 

Within the Enterprise Architects approach most of the necessary requirements have already been defined or can be retrieved based on the initial solutions as defined by the detailed PSA.

 

Tools to support Requirement Management

To support Requirement Management Enterprise Architects offers the following solutions and tools:

  • AFR/Function Requirement 
Maintaining the PROSA requirements for each Knowledge Function of the solution
  • APR/PROSA Management
Maintaining details of Principles, Requirements, design Objectives, Standards & Agreements for the solution
  • AAM/PSA Management 
Maintaining the PSA
  • ATS/Transition Support
Supporting the Transition during different phases
  • ATS/Interaction Support 
Supporting modeling EPICs, User Stories, Interaction Design and Presentation Services – Also see ISE

Advantages of the Enterprise Architects approach

  1. Maintaining and managing functional and non-functional requirements as derived by BC, PSA, PID, PROSA and interaction support, defining EPICs, User Stories, etc. in a central repository
  2. The SAFe™ Core Values are safeguarded and improved as follows
    • Transparency
    • Program Execution